The political debate is on. Two candidates trade barbs over taxes, healthcare, education — the usual suspects. One of them makes a strong point. It lands. It just makes sense.
Then comes the kicker: they’re from the other political party. The one that fundamentally is opposite to everything you stand for. And just like that, the mood shifts. That once solid argument now feels suspect. Agreement slowly transforms into annoyance and disbelief.
This isn’t just a one-off reaction — it’s a typical human pattern. In a study called Party Over Policy, researcher Geoffrey Cohen and colleagues found that people often respond more to who is making a statement than to what is being said. And it's a key reason American politics feels so polarized, personal, and often baffling. Even when a policy aligns with our values, we dismiss it if the “wrong” party presents it.
Party lines don’t just shape opinions; they shape reactions, instincts, and trust.
In Party Over Policy, researchers set out to see how deep party loyalty runs. They presented participants with policy proposals on two hot-button issues: welfare and taxes.
But there was a twist.
Each proposal was labeled as either coming from Democrats or Republicans. The policies were intentionally designed to be counter-stereotypical. In the experiment, the “Republican” proposal for welfare was actually a liberal policy, and the “Democratic” tax proposal was conservative.
What did they find? Participants overwhelmingly supported policies they believed were backed by their party, even when those policies went against their own stated values.
The takeaway is an uncomfortable truth and crucial to healing the ever-growing divide in America: our political identities shape our opinions more than the actual content of policies. If our party endorses something, we’re inclined to agree with it, even if we’d generally reject that idea on its merits.
This isn't about being irrational or unintelligent. It’s about belonging. Political parties aren’t just organizations — they’re tribes. And being part of a tribe means trusting the people in it. If they say a policy is good or bad, our instinct is to trust them over the policy details.
This explains why people often flip-flop on issues when their party’s stance changes. It’s not about changing minds; it’s about staying aligned with their group.
In the study, researchers found that party labels acted like shortcuts, or “cues,” that guided people’s decisions. Instead of digging into the nitty-gritty of a policy, we look at who supports it. This makes decision-making faster and makes us more prone to bias.
For example, imagine a Democrat sees a policy labeled “Republican.” Even if it’s about protecting the environment (which they normally support), they’re likely to reject it. The party cue — “Republican” — is stronger than the policy’s actual content.
This works the other way, too. Republicans might reject a tax-cutting proposal if it’s labeled “Democratic.”
This bias has enormous implications. It means:
What can we do to fight this tendency? Here are a few strategies:
If this post lit a spark—or poked at a blind spot— keep going. We’ve built a mini-course on “Party Over Policy” that unpacks the psychology of partisan bias in short, straightforward lessons that fit into your day without overwhelming it.
👉 Ready to go deeper? Stay tuned for our next course.