We rarely see a workplace divided into two opposing teams—each with different beliefs, approaches, and no trust between them. Especially where this split workplace is expected to collaborate on high-stakes projects.
In every meeting, ideas are dismissed outright. Compromises are framed as losses. Deadlines pass, tensions rise, and eventually, collaboration breaks down. Nothing gets done.
In business, this kind of dysfunction would sink a company. But in this case, the workplace is Congress—home to 535 lawmakers.
This is the actual cost of deepening polarization in the United States. It’s not just disagreement—it’s distrust. Not debate, but gridlock. And it’s become one of the greatest obstacles to solving the problems both parties agree need urgent action.
Congress isn’t just slow—it’s paralyzed. And it’s not because of a divided government. It’s because of deepening polarization that shows up in four powerful ways:
Each party is climbing a different ladder of values—focused on entirely different visions of what the government should do. When those ladders don’t overlap, compromise becomes nearly impossible.
We don’t just disagree with the other side—we distrust them. When political opponents are seen as threats, working together becomes politically dangerous.
Lawmaking happens in lurches: long periods of gridlock, interrupted by sudden, dramatic bursts of partisan activity. It’s reactive, not stable—and it creates policy whiplash.
As Congress gets stuck, presidents act alone. Executive orders and emergency declarations replace legislation, shifting power from a deliberative body to a single individual.
We often hear Washington is broken—Congress can’t pass meaningful laws, and the federal government has ground to a halt.
For years, the go-to explanation was “divided government,” where one party controls Congress and the other holds the presidency. But research suggests the dysfunction runs deeper.
Political scientist David R. Jones points to a more decisive factor: the size of the ideological gap between parties. The wider the gap, the more likely Congress stalls—even when one party holds complete control.
So what is this “ideological gap”?
Think of ideology as a ladder of values. Each party climbs its own, focused on different goals, priorities, and visions for the country. One ladder might emphasize smaller government and lower taxes. The other might focus on public investment and equity. These aren’t just competing policies—they’re fundamentally different frameworks. And they rarely intersect.
And that’s before emotion, fear, or political theater even come into play.
In theory, polarization means parties hold different views. In practice, it often turns into something far more corrosive: tribal warfare.
This emotional divide is known as affective polarization—and it’s rising fast. People don’t just think the other side is wrong; they see them as dangerous, immoral, even un-American.
A growing body of research shows this mistrust doesn’t just fuel outrage—it changes how the system functions. When political opponents are seen as threats, there’s little room left for negotiation, compromise, or even essential dialogue. This distrust spills into Congress, where working across the aisle isn’t just hard—it can be politically risky.
The result? More gridlock. Fewer solutions.
And when cooperation becomes a liability, Congress freezes.
Political scientists Clare Brock and Daniel Mallinson describe American lawmaking as a pattern of punctuated equilibrium: long stretches of inaction, interrupted by bursts of change.
Polarization stretches the quiet periods even further. Gridlock becomes the norm. Budgets stall. Big problems linger—until they explode.
When breakthroughs do happen, they’re often messy, dramatic, and entirely partisan—pushed through by the party with just enough temporary power to steamroll the other.
It creates a vicious cycle. One side governs alone. The other digs in. And when control shifts, the new majority tears it all down and starts over.
This is not a great approach to maintain a healthy democracy.
Gridlock doesn’t just stall legislation—it quietly shifts power from Congress to the presidency.
When lawmakers can’t act, presidents start acting alone. Executive orders, agency rules, and emergency declarations become the primary tools—not because they’re ideal, but because they’re available.
In a polarized climate, the pressure to act unilaterally grows. Presidents aren’t just expected to lead—they’re expected to dominate. And when Congress is seen as paralyzed, that expectation only intensifies.
Over time, this erodes the system of checks and balances. It fuels public frustration. And it leaves democracy more fragile—more vulnerable to anti-democratic behavior, no matter which party is in charge.
The good news: polarization isn’t destiny. Changing it means more than just “finding common ground.”
It means changing incentives, expectations, and habits—inside and outside of Congress.
Here’s where we can all begin to contribute to less partisan polarization and a healthier democracy.
Reforms like open primaries and ranked-choice voting reduce the power of ideological extremes and reward bridge-builders.
As James Clear put it: “Change the incentives and the behavior follows suit.”
Praise compromise—even when it’s unpopular. Reward leaders who work across the aisle, not just those who “fight.”
“All progress has resulted from people who took unpopular positions.” — Adlai Stevenson
Instead of seeking binary, all-or-nothing policy victories, accept partial victories as a good thing.
“A good compromise is when both parties are dissatisfied.” — Henry Clay
If you’re tired of the noise, the finger-pointing, and the endless stalemates—you’re not alone. And you’re not powerless.
We’ve built Post Party Politics to help you understand the root causes of polarization—and what can be done to fix it. With short, clear lessons, real research, and zero shouting.
Because a healthy political culture doesn’t just need better leaders. It needs us, thinking clearly and acting with intention.
👉 Curious what a healthier political culture could actually look like? Subscribe to our newsletter!
